From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:19:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:19:37 -0500 Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.74]:21703 "EHLO falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:19:37 -0500 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:35:51 -0500 To: akpm@digeo.com, piggin@cyberone.com.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.63-mm2 Message-ID: <20030309173551.GA3055@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2.5.64-mm1 on K6/2 uniprocessor completed the 24 hour benchmarks using anticipatory scheduler with no oops. (Badness in request_irq at arch/i386/kernel/irq.c:475 is known and non-fatal). 2.5.64-mm1 had ~ 47% improvement in tiobench sequential read throughput on ext2, compared to 2.5.64 on uniprocessor K6/2. 2.5.64-mm2 ran dbench, Linux Test Project, unixbench, lmbench with no problems on uniprocessor too. 2.5.64-mm4 is running on Quad Xeon now, and has finished dbench runs with no oops. -- Randy Hron http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html