From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:52:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:52:28 -0500 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:35589 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:52:27 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200303121905.h2CJ5449001606@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Subject: Re: bio too big device To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:05:04 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Linus Torvalds" at Mar 12, 2003 05:59:03 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >I am not quite sure I understand your reasoning. > >We have seen *zero* drives that do not understand 256 sector commands. > >Maybe such drives exist, but so far there is zero evidence. > > That is definitely not true. We definitely _have_ had drives that > misconstrue the 256-sector case. It's been a long time, but they > definitely exist. > > The right limit for IDE is 255 sectors, and doing 256 sectors WILL fail > on some setups. Couldn't we have a list of known good drives, though, and enable 256 sectors as a special case? John.