From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:09:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:09:30 -0500 Received: from mako.theneteffect.com ([63.97.58.10]:57360 "EHLO mako.theneteffect.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:09:29 -0500 From: Mitch Adair Message-Id: <200303150920.h2F9KGm16328@mako.theneteffect.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] update filesystems config. menu To: davej@codemonkey.org.uk (Dave Jones) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 03:20:16 -0600 (CST) Cc: "Randy.Dunlap"@mako.theneteffect.com, , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030315094151.GA16373@suse.de> from "Dave Jones" at Mar 15, 2003 08:41:57 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Note the ordering, ext3 gets tried before ext2. Was thinking of the "ext3 clings to you like flypaper" thread of a couple weeks ago, only backwards... -ESLEEPY Anyway, I have seen instances where root got mounted ext2 instead of ext3 (faulty initrd or whatever it was) - just wondered if the help should really push people to unreservedly say Y to ext2 if their root is really ext3... M