From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263191AbTCWUfa>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 15:35:30 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263192AbTCWUfa>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 15:35:30 -0500
Received: from h214n1fls32o988.telia.com ([62.20.176.214]:8460 "EHLO
	sirius.nix.badanka.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S263191AbTCWUf3>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 15:35:29 -0500
Message-Id: <200303232046.h2NKkZAx039361@sirius.nix.badanka.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:46:34 +0100
From: Henrik Persson <nix@socialism.nu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25
In-Reply-To: <200303231955.h2NJtWAx038337@sirius.nix.badanka.com>
References: <20030323193457.GA14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	<200303231938.h2NJcAq14927@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
	<20030323194423.GC14750@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
	<1048448838.1486.12.camel@phantasy.awol.org>
	<200303231955.h2NJtWAx038337@sirius.nix.badanka.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 20:55:31 +0100
Henrik Persson <nix@socialism.nu> wrote:

> Would it really hurt that much to release 2.4.21 with the ptracefix(es)?

Or would it hurt to release -pre6 like..right now with the fixes in it?

This combined with a small notice on kernel.org would most certainly
satisfy me, but as for now I had to browse trough the archives cause I
deleted the mail with the patch by accident, and that's not very optimal,
is it?

-- 
Henrik Persson  nix@socialism.nu  http://nix.badanka.com
PGP-key: http://nix.badanka.com/pgp  PGP-KeyID: 0x43B68116