From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263786AbTDDQaB (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:30:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263790AbTDDQ3s (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:29:48 -0500 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:51469 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263786AbTDDPww (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:52:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:04:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: William Scott Lockwood III Cc: "Richard B. Johnson" , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20030404170416.A26649@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , William Scott Lockwood III , "Richard B. Johnson" , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030404072327.J5167-100000@www.geekizoid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030404072327.J5167-100000@www.geekizoid.com>; from vlad@geekizoid.com on Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:28:12AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:28:12AM -0800, William Scott Lockwood III wrote: > Yes, I can see that. No matter who it alienates. Weither or not he's > checked with anyone else either. LKML is DaveM's list. If the choice he and his co-postmaster make don't suit yours or others need setup your own linux kernel list. > How about leting those of us who (like > Linus) choose to use a commercial email product do so? Garbage about > headers, etc. is just that - garbage. Who said anything about commercial products? lkml refuses _broken_ mails, it doesn't check what MUA you used. > and others got for using hotmail - I finally got sick and tired of the > whining and now have to take 3x as long to read my mail - but it's not a > hotmail address anymore, so the whining stoped. Why not spend less timing > restricting what people can read and post from, and just let people > participate? Please red the mail RFC and the nettiquette and come back once you've done that. Your current whining wastes our time.