From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263735AbTDGWoN (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:44:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263736AbTDGWoM (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:44:12 -0400 Received: from as6-4-8.rny.s.bonet.se ([217.215.27.171]:33030 "EHLO pc2.dolda2000.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263735AbTDGWoJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:44:09 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Fredrik Tolf To: Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:55:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200304080017.21799.fredrik@dolda2000.cjb.net> <3E91FAF0.4060400@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3E91FAF0.4060400@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200304080055.43562.fredrik@dolda2000.cjb.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:25, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > The use of /proc is growing and you'll find that more than just > fexecve() will fail if you don't have /proc. Well, that was no news, but still; you know like... shouldn't it be implemented? Or if I put it like this: If I were going to implemented, is there any kind of chance to get that public, not least considering that it is a new syscall and all? Fredrik Tolf