From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261804AbTDHVp1 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:45:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261866AbTDHVp1 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:45:27 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:2066 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261804AbTDHVp0 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:45:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 23:57:03 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Pavel Machek , Jes Sorensen , Martin Hicks , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wildos@sgi.com Subject: Re: [patch] printk subsystems Message-ID: <20030408215703.GA1538@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20030407201337.GE28468@bork.org> <20030408184109.GA226@elf.ucw.cz> <20030408210251.GA30588@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <3E933AB2.8020306@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E933AB2.8020306@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Well, I think we should first kill all crappy messages -- that > > benefits everyone. I believe that if we kill all unneccessary > > (carrying no information except perhaps copyright or advertising) > > will help current problem a lot. > > > > That may sometimes be true, but a few things may be useful to be able to > turn back on. Well, #define DEBUG in the driver seems like the way to go. I do not like "subsystem ID" idea, because subsystems are not really well defined etc. -- Horseback riding is like software... ...vgf orggre jura vgf serr.