From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263900AbTDIWA4 (for <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:00:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263907AbTDIWA4 (for <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:00:56 -0400
Received: from siaag2ad.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.134]:54995 "EHLO
	siaag2ad.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S263900AbTDIWAz (for <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:00:55 -0400
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:10:02 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic7* claims all checked EISA io ranges (was:
  [MAILER-DAEMON@rumms.u
To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>,
       linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Message-ID: <200304091812_MC3-1-33BC-8ED8@compuserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	 charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


>1) You don't trust maintainers.  If a maintainer can't make large
>changes, who can?


 I was wondering about that too.

 How can a major code restructure be done in tiny pieces?  I don't
think it can.


--
 Chuck
 I am not an octal number!