From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264093AbTDJQ0y (for ); Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:26:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264098AbTDJQ0x (for ); Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:26:53 -0400 Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.93]:34319 "EHLO serenity.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264097AbTDJQ0w (for ); Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:26:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:38:28 +0100 From: John Levon To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill two scsi ioctls Message-ID: <20030410163828.GC93213@compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/ X-Record: Mr. Scruff - Trouser Jazz X-Spam-Score: -30.9 (------------------------------) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *193f4G-000Ppg-Pd*0BiOk7z6oMk* Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > The definition for SCSI_IOCTL_BENCHMARK_COMMAND was added in 1.1.2. > The definition for SCSI_IOCTL_SYNC was added in 1.1.38. > Neither of them has ever been used. Can't you at least add a comment about what was there ? It's quite annoying to come across : #define FOO 1 #define BAR 2 #define BAZ 5 and have no idea why regards john