linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Gramoullé" <philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com>
To: Steve Kinneberg <kinnebergsteve@acmsystems.com>
Cc: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Linux1394dev <linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: 2.5.67-mm3: Bad: scheduling while atomic with IEEE1394 then hard freeze ( lockup on CPU0)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:30:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030417003031.2b603167.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1050514375.589.1843.camel@stevek>


Hello,

On 16 Apr 2003 10:32:54 -0700
Steve Kinneberg <kinnebergsteve@acmsystems.com> wrote:

  | On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 09:45, Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
  | > 
  | > # dmesg
  | > oot is not IRM capable, resetting...
  | > ieee1394: Remote root is not IRM capable, resetting...
  | > ieee1394: Remote root is not IRM capable, resetting...
  | > ieee1394: Remote root is not IRM capable, resetting...
  | > [message repeated 178 times and as long as the DV Camcorder in turned on]
  | 
  | I realize this isn't the problem you're really concerned about, but the
  | above may happen if you are using a version of the 1394 code off the
  | linux-2.4 branch prior to the patch I sent to the list Monday that Ben
  | recently applied.  (You should be able to get around this without
  | downloading the latest code and recompiling by setting attempt_root=1
  | when insmodding ohci1394.

Thanks for the tip. Anyway, for me 2.4 is no problem. Looking through the archives i saw that checking not the latest
code worked for me(tm) but this was some time ago and things may have changed ( i.e latest 2.4
code works as expected)

For 2.5, the thing is i remember being able to successfully use my DV Camcorder 
Canon Optura 200MC ( MVX2i in Europe) with IEEE1394 , around 2.5.59 IIRC.

Since then, i only got these "reset storms" versions over versions. Not that i complain about
but it's just that i hope that reporting bugs will be helpful to IEEE1394 developers, because
if it worked once,  then i don't see why i wouldn't work either with newer versions 8)

The goal for me is to switch asap to 2.5 as i see much improvements in my day to day
desktop use.

Thanks,

Philippe

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-16 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-15 22:05 2.5.67-mm3: Bad: scheduling while atomic with IEEE1394 then hard freeze ( lockup on CPU0) Philippe Gramoullé
2003-04-15 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-15 23:17   ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-04-15 23:34     ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-16  5:54       ` Greg KH
2003-04-16 16:58         ` Patrick Mochel
2003-04-16 23:40           ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-04-17  3:54             ` Greg KH
2003-04-16  0:49   ` Ben Collins
2003-04-16 16:45     ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-04-16 17:32       ` Steve Kinneberg
2003-04-16 22:30         ` Philippe Gramoullé [this message]
2003-04-16 23:35           ` Steve Kinneberg
2003-04-16 23:52             ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-04-17  2:48           ` Dan Maas
2003-04-16 18:09       ` Ben Collins
2003-04-18 18:51   ` Florin Iucha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030417003031.2b603167.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com \
    --to=philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=bcollins@debian.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kinnebergsteve@acmsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).