archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <>
Subject: Re: IPsecv6 integrity failures not dropped
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:10:14 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

   Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:17:04 -0500

   I modified ah6_input() and esp6_input() to return zero instead of -EINVAL
   in the fix below. I tested it and it works.
   Please let me know if this is ok. 

I think it would be better if ipv6's upper-layer interface worked
like ipv4's.  ie. a < 0 return value means:

	next_proto =- ret;
	goto resubmit;

The less that is different between ipv4/ipv6 the better.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-18 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-18 20:17 latten
2003-04-18 21:10 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-04-19  2:12   ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-04-19  2:17     ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-04-19  2:50 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-04-20  3:35   ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: IPsecv6 integrity failures not dropped' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).