From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263638AbTDTRTo (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:19:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263642AbTDTRTo (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:19:44 -0400 Received: from siaag2ab.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.132]:15849 "EHLO siaag2ab.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263638AbTDTRTn (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:19:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:28:21 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: linux-kernel Message-ID: <200304201331_MC3-1-3532-FFDA@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephan wrote: > Maybe I have something in common with google, I am re-writing large parts (well > over 50%) of the harddrives capacity on a daily basis (in the discussed setup). > how many people really do that? I'll bet the people who do are using SCSI disks... ------ Chuck