linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ISDN massive packet drops while DVD burn/verify
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:18:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030420181812.44844175.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1050789691.3955.17.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On 19 Apr 2003 23:01:32 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> On Sad, 2003-04-19 at 18:38, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > I don't buy that explanation. Reason is simple: during this all network
> > connections work flawlessly, and they do have quite a lot of interrupts
> > compared to ISDN. ISDN is so slow and has so few interrupts that it is
> > quite unlikely in a SMP-beyond-GHz-limit box that you loose some. The
> > ancient hardware days are long gone ...
> 
> I'd suggest buying his explanation, because he's right. You are
> confusing quantity and latency.

Sorry Alan, "been there, done that"
I made ISDN work on just about anything that you would call an OS on sometimes
quite ancient hardware (compared to nowadays), and I really cannot imagine that
the combined (though sometimes confusing) efforts of you, Andre, Pavel, name-one
on IDE made a dual 1.4 GHz PIII slower (responding) than a M68k 7,14 MHz with a
polling IDE interface - which happens to be the slowest thing I ever did ISDN
programming on _flawlessly_.

Regards,
Stephan

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-20 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-16 13:12 ISDN massive packet drops while DVD burn/verify Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-18 14:25 ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-04-19 17:38   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
     [not found]     ` <20030419205000.A3541@skunk.physik.uni-erlangen.de>
2003-04-19 20:23       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-04-19 22:01     ` Alan Cox
2003-04-20 16:18       ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-04-20 18:53         ` Alan Cox
2003-05-05 14:23         ` Karsten Keil
2003-05-05 15:32           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-05-05 16:46             ` Karsten Keil
2003-05-05 17:26               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-05-05 18:31                 ` Karsten Keil
2003-05-06 10:53                 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-06 12:39                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-05-06 12:56                     ` Alan Cox
2003-05-06 14:01                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-05-06 16:46                         ` Wolfgang Fritz
2003-05-06 14:13                       ` Mike Dresser
2003-05-06 13:06                     ` Karsten Keil
2003-05-06  9:52             ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030420181812.44844175.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).