From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263825AbTDUL7f (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:59:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263826AbTDUL7f (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:59:35 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:34432 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263825AbTDUL7d (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:59:33 -0400 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200304211214.h3LCEcQV000630@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Subject: Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? To: skraw@ithnet.com (Stephan von Krawczynski) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:14:38 +0100 (BST) Cc: john@grabjohn.com (John Bradford), josh@stack.nl, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030421132409.4636a001.skraw@ithnet.com> from "Stephan von Krawczynski" at Apr 21, 2003 01:24:09 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > And again, how do you think this should work out on your _root_ > > > partition? (see below) > > > > 1. Hot plug a new disk > > On Linux IDE ?? > > Are you sure? Yes. John.