From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new system call mknod64
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:27:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030421182734.GN10374@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304211117260.3101-100000@home.transmeta.com>
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 11:22:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> One way to avoid the bug is to always keep all dev_t numbers in "canonical
> format". Which happens automatically if the interface is <major, minor>
> rather than a 64-bit blob.
>
> I personally think that anything that uses "dev_t" in _any_ other way than
> <major,minor> is fundamentally broken.
Do you consider internal use of MKDEV-produced constants broken?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-21 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-20 21:26 [PATCH] new system call mknod64 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-20 21:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-20 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 11:59 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-21 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 18:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-21 18:21 ` viro
2003-04-21 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 18:27 ` viro [this message]
2003-04-21 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 18:54 ` viro
2003-04-21 19:16 ` Jörn Engel
2003-04-21 18:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-21 18:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 18:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-21 18:58 ` viro
2003-04-21 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 19:35 ` viro
2003-04-21 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 19:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 18:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 23:49 ` Roman Zippel
[not found] <20030421215009$2052@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030421231010$7ee3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030422000016$17e3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030422083014$0fe2@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-04-22 20:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-22 1:02 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-22 1:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-22 2:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-22 2:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-22 6:00 ` jw schultz
2003-04-22 17:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 21:48 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-21 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 21:43 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-21 23:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 23:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-22 8:24 ` Shachar Shemesh
2003-04-20 22:12 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-21 6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-20 20:34 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-20 21:12 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-20 18:39 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-20 18:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030421182734.GN10374@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).