From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264108AbTDWQJG (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:09:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264112AbTDWQJG (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:09:06 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:49841 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264108AbTDWQJF (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:09:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:23:11 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Hanna Linder Cc: Patrick Mochel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andmike@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Device class rework [0/5] Message-ID: <20030423162311.GB11175@kroah.com> References: <20030422205545.GA4701@kroah.com> <172940000.1051059583@w-hlinder> <20030423015454.GA6298@kroah.com> <41570000.1051114688@w-hlinder> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41570000.1051114688@w-hlinder> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:18:08AM -0700, Hanna Linder wrote: > --On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 06:54:54 PM -0700 Greg KH wrote: > > >> I did a quick sanity test of these patches on a 2-way PIII. > >> It built and booted fine for me. I don't have any devices that > >> span multiple classes but the patch hasnt changed any of my > >> existing /sys/class output. > > > > Hm, are you sure you applied them and are using that kernel? :) > > > > Yes. I did apply the patches... Just not to the kernel I booted ;( > > Here is the correct tree I see on my 2xPIII: > > > /sys/class > |-- cpu > | |-- cpu0 > | | `-- device -> ../../../devices/sys/cpu0 > | `-- cpu1 > | `-- device -> ../../../devices/sys/cpu1 Looks good. That "foo" file in the example I posted was from an older kernel version on one of my boxes. This is the correct information. Thanks for testing, greg k-h