From: Marc Giger <gigerstyle@gmx.ch>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix SWSUSP & !SWAP
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:49:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030424094901.435101a6.gigerstyle@gmx.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28790000.1051159060@[10.10.2.4]>
Good Morning All:-)
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:37:41 -0700
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:
> >> > I don't believer I've ever seen things get OOM killed. Instead, page
> >> > cache is discarded until things do fit.
> >>
> >> What happens if user allocated pages are filling up all the space,
> >> not page cache? Trust me, it happens ;-)
> >
Yes, it happens...:-)
> > Yep, just because I haven't seen it, doesn't mean a thing. :>. In that
<snip>
</snip>
> The more I think about this, the more it seems so much simpler to just
> require a reserved swap area the size of your RAM to suspend into. Would
> make the code so much simpler ... forget the option bit I suggested earlier
> ;-)
I think most people doesn't interest wheter the code is simple or not...it must work!
What I like to see is that we can define in /etc/fstab an entry for a separate suspend partition or suspend file.
eg. for a partition:
/dev/sda4 none swsusp swsp 0 0
or for a file:
/tmp/swsusp none swsusp swsp 0 0
Is it possible? It's also just an idea...
Marc
Also I wouldn't like it, if my programs get OOM-killed just because swap and memory are full! The reasons because I use standby and hybernation are:
1. I hate booting...(If I like booting I would use windows;-))
2. I want to continue working on the last work without opening the programs again
3. I can go home faster:-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-24 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-23 23:47 Fix SWSUSP & !SWAP Grover, Andrew
2003-04-24 0:03 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-23 23:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-24 0:25 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 0:37 ` CaT
2003-04-24 0:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-24 9:16 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 0:02 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-24 0:23 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 0:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-24 3:17 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-24 4:37 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-24 7:49 ` Marc Giger [this message]
2003-04-24 9:27 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 3:49 ` David Ford
2003-04-24 6:54 ` Jörn Engel
2003-04-24 7:01 ` Elladan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-23 13:51 Pavel Machek
2003-04-23 14:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-04-23 14:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-23 15:56 ` gigerstyle
2003-04-23 19:41 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-23 20:36 ` Marc Giger
2003-04-23 22:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-23 23:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-23 23:58 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-23 23:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-24 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 0:17 ` CaT
2003-04-24 0:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-24 0:26 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-04-24 0:31 ` CaT
2003-04-24 0:38 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 0:54 ` CaT
2003-04-24 1:06 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 8:48 ` John Bradford
2003-04-24 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 9:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 9:35 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 9:46 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 11:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-24 11:36 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 14:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 16:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-04-24 20:48 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 21:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-04-25 1:09 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-25 12:59 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-25 16:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-04-25 18:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-25 19:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-25 19:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-04-27 18:59 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 11:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-04-25 1:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-25 1:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-04-25 1:31 ` Hua Zhong
2003-04-25 19:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-25 4:27 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-04-25 4:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-24 0:25 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 9:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 9:14 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 9:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-24 9:34 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-24 15:22 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-04-24 8:00 ` Marc Giger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030424094901.435101a6.gigerstyle@gmx.ch \
--to=gigerstyle@gmx.ch \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).