From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262577AbTDXJeU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 05:34:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262594AbTDXJeU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 05:34:20 -0400 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:64529 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262577AbTDXJeS (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 05:34:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:46:20 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Mika Kukkonen , LKML , cgl_discussion@osdl.org, Mark Huth , Tigran Aivazian Subject: Re: OSDL CGL-WG draft specs available for review Message-ID: <20030424104620.A25801@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , Mika Kukkonen , LKML , cgl_discussion@osdl.org, Mark Huth , Tigran Aivazian References: <1051044403.1384.44.camel@miku-t21-redhat.koti> <20030423174958.A2603@infradead.org> <3EA7B0D1.8090604@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3EA7B0D1.8090604@gmx.net>; from c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net on Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:39:29AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:39:29AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > IIRC, Mark Huth from MontaVista and Tigran Aivazian from Veritas both > developed such an implementation independently of each other. > Maybe they can offer some insight. Tigran had a revoke(2) implementation - that's forced revokation of a fd, not forced umount. But maybe he did forced umount, too? :)