* [BUG 2.5.X] pipe/fcntl/F_GETFL/F_SETFL obvious kernel bug
@ 2003-04-24 18:33 Jean Tourrilhes
2003-04-24 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Tourrilhes @ 2003-04-24 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux kernel mailing list, Jeff Garzik, davem, kuznet
Hi,
I reported this obvious kernel 2.5.X bug 6 months ago, and as
of 2.5.67 it is still not fixed. Do you know who I should send this
bug report to ?
Thanks...
Jean
---------------------------------------------
Compile test program below.
On 2.5.67 :
GET FLAGS : 0 - 40044F18
SET FLAGS : -1 - 22
On 2.4.21-pre7 :
GET FLAGS : 0 - 40043F18
SET FLAGS : 0 - 0
---------------------------------------------
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int trigger_pipe[2];
int err;
int flags;
pipe(trigger_pipe);
err = fcntl(trigger_pipe[0], F_GETFL, &flags);
fprintf(stderr, "GET FLAGS : %d - %X\n", err, flags);
if(err >= 0)
{
flags |= O_NONBLOCK;
//flags |= O_NDELAY;
//flags &= ~O_NDELAY;
err = fcntl(trigger_pipe[0], F_SETFL, flags);
fprintf(stderr, "SET FLAGS : %d - %d\n", err, errno);
}
return(0);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG 2.5.X] pipe/fcntl/F_GETFL/F_SETFL obvious kernel bug
2003-04-24 18:33 [BUG 2.5.X] pipe/fcntl/F_GETFL/F_SETFL obvious kernel bug Jean Tourrilhes
@ 2003-04-24 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 21:35 ` Jean Tourrilhes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2003-04-24 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jt; +Cc: jt, linux-kernel, jgarzik, davem, kuznet
Jean Tourrilhes <jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I reported this obvious kernel 2.5.X bug 6 months ago, and as
> of 2.5.67 it is still not fixed. Do you know who I should send this
> bug report to ?
fcntl(fd, F_GETFL, intp) does not put the return value into *intp. The
flags are in fcntl()'s return value. Same with 2.4.
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int trigger_pipe[2];
int err;
int flags;
int newflags;
pipe(trigger_pipe);
/* Get flags */
flags = fcntl(trigger_pipe[0], F_GETFL, NULL);
fprintf(stderr, "Set flags: 0x%x\n", flags);
/* Set flags */
flags |= O_NONBLOCK;
err = fcntl(trigger_pipe[0], F_SETFL, flags);
fprintf(stderr, "Set flags: %d\n", err);
/* Check flags */
flags = fcntl(trigger_pipe[0], F_GETFL, NULL);
fprintf(stderr, "Get flags: 0x%0x\n", flags);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG 2.5.X] pipe/fcntl/F_GETFL/F_SETFL obvious kernel bug
2003-04-24 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2003-04-24 21:35 ` Jean Tourrilhes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Tourrilhes @ 2003-04-24 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, jgarzik, davem, kuznet
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:23:06PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jean Tourrilhes <jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I reported this obvious kernel 2.5.X bug 6 months ago, and as
> > of 2.5.67 it is still not fixed. Do you know who I should send this
> > bug report to ?
>
> fcntl(fd, F_GETFL, intp) does not put the return value into *intp. The
> flags are in fcntl()'s return value. Same with 2.4.
*blush*. Thanks for the quick and precise answer, and sorry
about the noise.
Jean
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-24 21:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-24 18:33 [BUG 2.5.X] pipe/fcntl/F_GETFL/F_SETFL obvious kernel bug Jean Tourrilhes
2003-04-24 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-24 21:35 ` Jean Tourrilhes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).