From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: bcrl@redhat.com, akpm@digeo.com, mbligh@aracnet.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.68-mm2
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:20:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030425112042.37493d02.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030425135538.16623C-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:56:31 -0400 (EDT) Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
| On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
|
| > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 04:24:56PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
| > > Of course reasonable way may mean that bash does some things a bit slower,
| > > but given that the whole thing works well in most cases anyway, I think
| > > the kernel handling the situation is preferable.
| >
| > Eh? It makes bash _faster_ for all cases of starting up a child process.
| > And it even works on 2.4 kernels.
|
| The point is that even if bash is fixed it's desirable to address the
| issue in the kernel, other applications may well misbehave as well.
So when would this ever end?
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-25 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-23 8:20 2.5.68-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-04-23 9:59 ` 2.5.68-mm2 William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-23 16:50 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Robert Love
2003-04-23 16:57 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-23 17:11 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Robert Love
2003-04-24 9:14 ` 2.5.68-mm2 William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-23 14:51 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-23 15:14 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Alex Tomas
2003-04-23 21:46 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-04-23 21:47 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-24 3:39 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Benjamin LaHaise
2003-04-24 21:13 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-24 23:13 ` objrmap (was 2.5.68-mm2) Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-24 3:36 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Benjamin LaHaise
2003-04-24 20:24 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2003-04-24 20:33 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Benjamin LaHaise
2003-04-25 17:56 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2003-04-25 18:20 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2003-04-25 18:27 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Robert Love
2003-04-25 18:49 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-26 10:34 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2003-04-26 15:34 ` 2.5.68-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-01 6:19 ` [BUG] 2.5.68-mm2 and list.h Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-05-01 6:31 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030425112042.37493d02.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).