From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Alexander Atanasov <alex@ssi.bg>,
linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] IDE Power Management try 1
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:58:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030425135829.GM1012@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0304251414430.12558-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
On Fri, Apr 25 2003, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On 25 Apr 2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > > If you add REQ_DRIVE_INTERNAL, and kill the other ones I mentioned, fine
> > > with me then.
> > >
> > > rq->flags & REQ_DRIVE_INTERNAL
> > > rq->cmd[0] == PM
> > > pm stuf
> > > rq->cmd[0] = taskfile
> > > taskfile
> > >
> > > etc. Make sense?
> >
> > As I just wrote, I'd rather go the whole way then and break up flags
> > (which is a very bad name btw) into req_type & req_subtype, though
> > that would mean a bit of driver fixing....
> >
> > Ben.
>
> req_type & req_subtype makes sense,
> but it is future since driver work is needed
100% agree. It's way too late to change that now. Besides, there's still
plenty of space in there, especially if the IDE bits are collapsed into
one.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-25 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-24 12:59 [RFC/PATCH] IDE Power Management try 1 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-25 9:35 ` Alexander Atanasov
2003-04-25 10:33 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-25 11:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-25 12:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-04-25 11:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-25 11:49 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-25 11:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-25 11:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-25 12:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-04-25 12:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-25 12:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-04-25 12:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-04-25 13:58 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030425135829.GM1012@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=alex@ssi.bg \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).