From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263891AbTDYL6v (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:58:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263892AbTDYL6v (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:58:51 -0400 Received: from [80.190.48.67] ([80.190.48.67]:7686 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263891AbTDYL6u (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:58:50 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: andersen@codepoet.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: ALSA and 2.4.x Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:10:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <20030424212508.GI14661@codepoet.org> <200304251401.36430.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> In-Reply-To: <200304251401.36430.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304251410.31701.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 25 April 2003 14:01, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: Hi again, > > I was crazy enough to take ALSA 0.9.2 and made it into a patch vs > > 2.4.x a week or two ago. I just prefer to have ALSA be part of > > the kernel rather than needing to compile it seperately all the > > time. The patch, along with various other things, is included as > > part of my 2.4.21-rc1-erik kernel: > Are you sure that this is 0.9.2 ALSA? I am afraid it is 0.9.0-rc6. this looks _very_ similar to the patch I had in WOLK4 some time ago and it was 0.9.0-rc6. ciao, Marc