From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
To: zbrown@tumblerings.org (Zack Brown)
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds),
marcelo@conectiva.com.br (Marcelo Tosatti),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing List)
Subject: Re: ChangeLog suggestion
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 07:52:19 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304260652.h3Q6qJmB000386@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030426062105.GA1423@renegade> from "Zack Brown" at Apr 25, 2003 11:21:05 PM
> In each changelog entry, it would be really useful to include the
> Message-ID of that email in a regex-parsable location. This way, if the
> email was cced to lkml it would be possible for folks to track down the
> actual patch.
>
> I'm not familiar with your scripts, but I'd be surprised if this were very
> difficult to implement. At the same time, there are many cases of changelog
> entries that read only 'USB' or something equally unhelpful, where there is
> little chance that anyone could track down the corresponding patch. Having the
> Message-ID in those cases would make all the difference in the world.
The changelogs are generated by BitKeeper - couldn't we simply include
a link that will let anybody[1] access the relevant changesets?
[1] This can be via HTTP, and _doesn't_ require anybody to use
BitKeeper in any way.
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-26 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-26 6:21 ChangeLog suggestion Zack Brown
2003-04-26 6:52 ` John Bradford [this message]
2003-04-26 15:12 ` Zack Brown
2003-04-26 17:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-26 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-26 16:50 ` Larry McVoy
2003-04-26 16:50 ` John Bradford
2003-04-26 16:53 ` John Bradford
2003-04-26 17:07 ` Zack Brown
2003-04-26 16:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-26 17:44 ` Shachar Shemesh
2003-04-26 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-26 18:17 ` Shachar Shemesh
2003-04-26 18:23 ` Larry McVoy
2003-04-26 18:29 ` Jörn Engel
2003-04-26 20:08 b_adlakha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200304260652.h3Q6qJmB000386@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk \
--to=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zbrown@tumblerings.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).