* Coding regulations
@ 2003-04-26 2:14 rmoser
2003-04-26 9:21 ` Jörn Engel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: rmoser @ 2003-04-26 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Yeah just a quick question. Not that I am actually able to code kernel
level drivers (I wish), but when I do code that would be part of one, I would
prefer not to make it a hassle for others to impliment.
To the point, I tend to do C++ classes, then make a C interface. Makes
it easier for me to program. Now, you may not want to mess with the C++
and convert it over, plus you may not want C++ code in the kernel. I am
about to start on the compression code for the fast algorithm that may be
used for kernel swap compression and compressed swap-on-ram, assuming
these swap modules are implimented. I don't want to cause any... oddities.
The C interfaces are just C functions that take a numerical handle which
identifies a class in a self-sorting linked list, as well as all the other data that
goes to each member function of the classes. I can still do it in C alone but
it's a little more work. Just don't wanna mess anyone/anything up.
--Bluefox Icy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Coding regulations
2003-04-26 2:14 Coding regulations rmoser
@ 2003-04-26 9:21 ` Jörn Engel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jörn Engel @ 2003-04-26 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rmoser; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, 25 April 2003 22:14:12 -0400, rmoser wrote:
>
> Yeah just a quick question. Not that I am actually able to code kernel
> level drivers (I wish), but when I do code that would be part of one, I would
> prefer not to make it a hassle for others to impliment.
>
> To the point, I tend to do C++ classes, then make a C interface. Makes
> it easier for me to program. Now, you may not want to mess with the C++
> and convert it over, plus you may not want C++ code in the kernel. I am
> about to start on the compression code for the fast algorithm that may be
> used for kernel swap compression and compressed swap-on-ram, assuming
> these swap modules are implimented. I don't want to cause any... oddities.
>
> The C interfaces are just C functions that take a numerical handle which
> identifies a class in a self-sorting linked list, as well as all the other data that
> goes to each member function of the classes. I can still do it in C alone but
> it's a little more work. Just don't wanna mess anyone/anything up.
The kernel uses c only (plus a little asm, if there is just no other
possibility). If it is trivial for me to convert your c++ to c, I will
do that. But since I don't really speak c++, c would be nicer.
Jörn
--
Data dominates. If you've chosen the right data structures and organized
things well, the algorithms will almost always be self-evident. Data
structures, not algorithms, are central to programming.
-- Rob Pike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-26 9:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-26 2:14 Coding regulations rmoser
2003-04-26 9:21 ` Jörn Engel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).