From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263120AbTD0Mka (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:40:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263958AbTD0Mka (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:40:30 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:3854 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263120AbTD0Mk3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:40:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:52:38 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Riley Williams Cc: Andi Kleen , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support worst case cache line sizes as config option Message-ID: <20030427125238.GA1083@averell> References: <20030427022346.GA27933@averell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 01:36:45PM +0200, Riley Williams wrote: > Does the order of those "default" lines actually matter? > Your moving that one to the top of the list appears to imply that it does. I don't know if it matters, probably not. -Andi