From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261175AbTD1P24 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:28:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261181AbTD1P24 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:28:56 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:5760 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261175AbTD1P2z (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:28:55 -0400 Message-Id: <200304281541.h3SFf35U001534@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: margitsw@t-online.de (Margit Schubert-While) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: #if vs #ifdef - 2.4.x/2.5.x In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:51:21 +0200." <4.3.2.7.2.20030428164640.00b72c00@pop.t-online.de> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030428164640.00b72c00@pop.t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_101661447P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:41:03 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_101661447P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:51:21 +0200, margitsw@t-online.de (Margit Schubert-While) said: > Anybody tried a "grep -r #if CONFIG" on 2.4 and 2.5 > kernels recently ? > Most revealing :-) Umm.. that's probably my fault. ;) --==_Exmh_101661447P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE+rUuPcC3lWbTT17ARAuwWAKCbFjWQNN5Ur8pW43/6uT13fpcPBACgkQI5 yLHYq8C0dSLxq+bPu9CjNzE= =FIER -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_101661447P--