From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261786AbTD3Cdw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:33:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261848AbTD3Cdw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:33:52 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:1943 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261786AbTD3Cdw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:33:52 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: rmoser , John Bradford Subject: Re: Swap Compression Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:48:07 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200304292114.h3TLEHBu003733@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <200304292059150060.002E747A@smtp.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <200304292059150060.002E747A@smtp.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304301248.07777.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:59, rmoser wrote: > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 4/29/2003 at 10:14 PM John Bradford wrote: > >> I want to start from scratch because I am trying a different angle, > >> and I don't understand fully current projects on it. > > > >There is nothing wrong from having a separate, parallel project > >running - it's a good idea, and generally helps to spark interest in > >both projects. > > THANK YOU! > > You've saved me from having to defend meself. I don't think a parallel project is a bad idea either. I was just suggesting adding the minilzo algorithm from the linuxcompressed project as one of the compression algorithms available. Con