IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Wojciech Sobczak]

Helo,
I'm trying to boot from linux kernel 2.4 tree
i've installed rh 7.1 dist, but system seems only 3 procesors, so i made
2.4.20 kernel with smp without NUMA support and i saw 4 processors. Next
2.4.20 with numa support, and system hangs on mounting root filesystem (no
scsi devices found, ide devices lost interruption, no keyboard found etc
etc)
Next 2.4.21-rc1-ac3 without NUMA, 3-processors available
with NUMA support and summit/exa support and clustered apic support kernel
boots, found scsi devices but hangs on it with lost interruption, also with
ide devices and so on
machine has 4 HT processors and 8GB of RAM
any ideas or help?

i don't wat to use 2.5.x kernel.....

regards

Sobczak Wojciech

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Martin J. Bligh]

> I'm trying to boot from linux kernel 2.4 tree
> i've installed rh 7.1 dist, but system seems only 3 procesors, so i made
> 2.4.20 kernel with smp without NUMA support and i saw 4 processors. Next
> 2.4.20 with numa support, and system hangs on mounting root filesystem (no
> scsi devices found, ide devices lost interruption, no keyboard found etc
> etc)
> Next 2.4.21-rc1-ac3 without NUMA, 3-processors available
> with NUMA support and summit/exa support and clustered apic support kernel
> boots, found scsi devices but hangs on it with lost interruption, also
> with ide devices and so on
> machine has 4 HT processors and 8GB of RAM
> any ideas or help?
> 
> i don't wat to use 2.5.x kernel.....

SuSE works well, at least the SLES edition does.

I'm not sure that any of the other 2.4 kernels work properly, though I
can't say I've tried the latest updates to other distros - they might work,
but I doubt 7.1 does - that's very old.

M.

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Wojciech Sobczak]

Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> SuSE works well, at least the SLES edition does.

but shoudn't it be platform independent? this is only kernel or meaby i need
new gcc... or meaby something else?....

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Martin J. Bligh]

>> SuSE works well, at least the SLES edition does.
> 
> but shoudn't it be platform independent? this is only kernel or meaby i
> need new gcc... or meaby something else?....

You need the kernel itself. It's the apic handling that's mostly different.

M.

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Wojciech Sobczak]

Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>>> SuSE works well, at least the SLES edition does.
>>
>> but shoudn't it be platform independent? this is only kernel or
>> meaby i need new gcc... or meaby something else?....
>
> You need the kernel itself. It's the apic handling that's mostly
> different.

ok, thanks to all folks for help,
i'm now using 2.5.68 with linux-isp patch for qlogic support, system is
working nice, i see all 8 processors but cpuinfo shows only 199 bogomips,
but system performance is much much higher :), so meaby this is some kind of
not important bug.
as for now i will try to swich to 2.4.21-rc1 as Keith Mannthey gave me
working kernel config for 2.4

so now  i've got one of them (servers) for kernel testing :)

from the battle field - i tryied to run on 2.5.68-mm3 tree but system hangs
on processors recognition.

as for qlogic support with linux-isp - is this driver with failover support?

regards
WS

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Patrick Mansfield]

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Wojciech Sobczak wrote:
> 
> as for qlogic support with linux-isp - is this driver with failover support?
> 

It has no failover (or multipath) support.

-- Patrick Mansfield

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Jack F. Vogel]

On Wednesday 30 April 2003 07:50 am, Wojciech Sobczak wrote:
> Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > SuSE works well, at least the SLES edition does.
>
> but shoudn't it be platform independent? this is only kernel or meaby i
> need new gcc... or meaby something else?....

I has nothing to do with gcc, Alan mentioned the magic (or cursed is
probably the better choice :) word, ACPI. The kernel in SLES 8 has
the x440 blacklisted so ACPI gets turned off automagically :)

As John mentioned, you can use a generic kernel provided its 
recent enough AND you configure it properly for the box.

Cheers,

-- 
Jack F. Vogel		IBM Linux Technology Center
jfv@us.ibm.com (work)  ||  jfv@bluesong.net (home)

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Alan Cox]

On Mer, 2003-04-30 at 19:36, Jack F. Vogel wrote:
> I has nothing to do with gcc, Alan mentioned the magic (or cursed is
> probably the better choice :) word, ACPI. The kernel in SLES 8 has
> the x440 blacklisted so ACPI gets turned off automagically :)

Perhaps someone could submit the x440 blacklist entry to the base kernel
?

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Alan Cox]

On Mer, 2003-04-30 at 13:56, Wojciech Sobczak wrote:
> with NUMA support and summit/exa support and clustered apic support kernel
> boots, found scsi devices but hangs on it with lost interruption, also with
> ide devices and so on

That sounds like a bug. Make sure you ACPI off for x440 if you are
testing and see if that helps


For vendor kernels you need Red Hat AS 2.1 or UnitedLinux 1.0. At least
I don't believe other vendors rolled kernels for x440 but I may be wrong
about that - certainly I can believe Debian or Gentoo might have.

x440 is sufficiently weird it needs its own extras and that makes it
hard to support for vendors.

Alan

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[john stultz]

Wojciech Sobczak wrote:

> Helo,
> I'm trying to boot from linux kernel 2.4 tree
[snip]
> i don't wat to use 2.5.x kernel.....

Support for the x440 landed ~2.4.21-pre4. 
Try a more recent 2.4 kernel.

thanks
-john

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[john stultz]

Alan Cox wrote:

> On Mer, 2003-04-30 at 19:36, Jack F. Vogel wrote:
>> I has nothing to do with gcc, Alan mentioned the magic (or cursed is
>> probably the better choice :) word, ACPI. The kernel in SLES 8 has
>> the x440 blacklisted so ACPI gets turned off automagically :)
> 
> Perhaps someone could submit the x440 blacklist entry to the base kernel
> ?

Acatually, the blacklist is only needed on the SuSE kernel because they are
using a backport of the 2.5 ACPI code.  However a tiny bit of code used to
ID and enable the summit bits sliped through and the quick solution was to
blacklist it until the proper fix is included. 

Right now there are no x440 specific patches pending for Vanilla 2.4 or
Vanilla 2.5. As issues are found and resolved, patches will be submitted
first thing for inclusion into mainline.

thanks
-john

Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3

[Alan Cox]

On Sad, 2003-05-03 at 19:14, john stultz wrote:
> Right now there are no x440 specific patches pending for Vanilla 2.4 or
> Vanilla 2.5. As issues are found and resolved, patches will be submitted
> first thing for inclusion into mainline.

x440 doesnt work with the ACPI in the 2.4 update from Intel either. I don't
really care whether IBM fix that before it goes into 2.4.22pre1 or after.