From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263250AbTECENU (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2003 00:13:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263251AbTECENT (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2003 00:13:19 -0400 Received: from mx12.arcor-online.net ([151.189.8.88]:62876 "EHLO mx12.arcor-online.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263250AbTECENT (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2003 00:13:19 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Christoph Hellwig , The Spirit of Open Source Subject: Re: Did the SCO Group plant UnixWare source in the Linux kernel? Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 06:26:36 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030502064349.A9988@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20030502064349.A9988@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20030503042544.4413513BD9E@mx12.arcor-online.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, On Fri 02 May 03 07:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It might be more interesting to look for stolen Linux code in Unixware, > I'd suggest with the support for a very well known Linux fileystem in > the Linux compat addon product for UnixWare.. So... we should check UnixWare to see if any of the Ext2 support is provided by GPL code ripped and distributed under the UnixWare license, which is presumably not compatible with the GPL? I know that's what you meant, I just thought I'd spell it out. To date, I've never had the slightest interest in UnixWare, but now I'm getting at least a little interested. UnixWare includes Ext2 support? The UnixWare license doesn't guarantee the user can have the source? Regards, Daniel