From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262427AbTEFHKu (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 03:10:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262429AbTEFHKu (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 03:10:50 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:34277 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262427AbTEFHKt (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 03:10:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 23:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20030505.231553.68055974.davem@redhat.com> To: akpm@digeo.com Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, dipankar@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030506002229.631a642a.akpm@digeo.com> References: <20030505235549.5df75866.akpm@digeo.com> <20030505.225748.35026531.davem@redhat.com> <20030506002229.631a642a.akpm@digeo.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 00:22:29 -0700 "David S. Miller" wrote: > > Make kmalloc_per_cpu() merely a convenience macro, made up of existing > non-percpu primitives. I think we're agreeing here. As just pointed out by dipankar the only issue is NUMA... so it has to be something more sophisticated than simply kmalloc()[smp_processor_id];