From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Parse new-style boot parameters just before initcalls
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:05:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030512040100.C7B972C0D7@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 May 2003 18:19:36 +0200." <Pine.SOL.4.30.0305101735410.20755-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
In message <Pine.SOL.4.30.0305101735410.20755-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl> you w
rite:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've redone this patch. I've tested it and works okay for me.
> It is as minimal as possible and I hope it can go in 2.5 soon.
Only one request, that you push this slightly more, and make
setup_arch() call parse_early_args(). Does that break something?
That way the arch-specific parsing in setup_arch() can be converted to
__setup (but doesn't need to be: archs can take their time).
ie. we already have two-stage parsing, it'd be nice not to make it
three.
Minor nitpick:
> @@ -241,7 +279,7 @@ static int __init unknown_bootoption(cha
> val[-1] = '=';
>
> /* Handle obsolete-style parameters */
> - if (obsolete_checksetup(param))
> + if (obsolete_test_checksetup(param))
> return 0;
>
Change comment to /* Ignore early params: already done in
parse_early_args */ or something, and maybe rename
obsolete_test_checksetup() to is_early_setup().
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-12 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-10 16:19 [PATCH] Parse new-style boot parameters just before initcalls Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-10 16:25 ` [PATCH] Switch ide parameters to new-style and make them unique Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-11 14:59 ` Jeremy Jackson
2003-05-11 15:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-11 16:35 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-12 1:49 ` Jeremy Jackson
2003-05-12 6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2003-05-12 12:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-05-12 2:21 ` Rusty Russell
2003-05-12 2:05 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-05-12 12:05 ` [PATCH] Parse new-style boot parameters just before initcalls Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030512040100.C7B972C0D7@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).