From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264008AbTEWKZ6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2003 06:25:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264009AbTEWKZ6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2003 06:25:58 -0400 Received: from mail.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.8]:49412 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264008AbTEWKZ5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2003 06:25:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 12:38:37 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: willy@w.ods.org Cc: gibbs@scsiguy.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Undo aic7xxx changes Message-Id: <20030523123837.6521738f.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030512110218.4bbc1afe.skraw@ithnet.com> References: <2804790000.1052441142@aslan.scsiguy.com> <20030509120648.1e0af0c8.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030509120659.GA15754@alpha.home.local> <20030509150207.3ff9cd64.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030509145738.GB17581@alpha.home.local> <20030512110218.4bbc1afe.skraw@ithnet.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 May 2003 11:02:18 +0200 Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Fri, 9 May 2003 16:57:38 +0200 > Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 04:11:06PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 May 2003 15:27:57 +0200 > > > Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > > > > Well, would you at least agree to retest current version from the above > > > > URL ? I find it a bit of a shame that the driver goes back in -rc > > > > stage. > > > > > > Ok, I can tell you at least this: it boots. Just did it. I can tell > > > tomorrow how it behaves with my specific problem. > > > > Thanks for having tried ;-) > > Hello all, > > I have tried 2.4.21-rc2 with aic79xx-linux-2.4-20030502-tar.gz for three days > now and have to say it performs well. I had no freezes any more and nothing > weird happening. Everything is smooth and ok. This is the best performance I > have seen comparing all 2.4.21-X versions tested. > > Thanks a lot. > > I will proceed with further stress tests... Ok. I managed to crash the tested machine after 14 days now. The crash itself is exactly like former 2.4.21-X. It just freezes, no oops no nothing. It looks like things got better, but not solved. Regards, Stephan