From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263953AbTE0RCu (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 13:02:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263957AbTE0RCu (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 13:02:50 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:6590 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263953AbTE0RCt (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 13:02:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 19:16:05 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: James Bottomley Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] add ata scsi driver Message-ID: <20030527171605.GL845@suse.de> References: <1053972773.2298.177.camel@mulgrave> <20030526181852.GL845@suse.de> <1053974830.1768.190.camel@mulgrave> <20030526190707.GM845@suse.de> <1053976644.2298.194.camel@mulgrave> <20030526193327.GN845@suse.de> <20030527123901.GJ845@suse.de> <1054045594.1769.24.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1054045594.1769.24.camel@mulgrave> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 27 2003, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 08:39, Jens Axboe wrote: > > James, something like this would be enough then (untested, compiles)? > > Yes...the only concern I would have is that if you downsize the tag map, > you don't seem to keep any memory of what the high water mark actually > is. Thus, I can drop the depth by 8 and then increase it again by 4 and > you won't see that the increase can be accommodated by the already > allocated space. If you increase it again, the maps are resized. Is that a problem? Seems ok to me. -- Jens Axboe