From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264895AbTFCCPk (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:15:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264896AbTFCCPk (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:15:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:34464 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264895AbTFCCPj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:15:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 19:28:59 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Aaron Lehmann Cc: Rob Landley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BKCVS issue Message-ID: <20030603022859.GA26322@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Aaron Lehmann , Rob Landley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030602211436.GF14878@vitelus.com> <200306021937.03013.rob@landley.net> <20030603003739.GG14878@vitelus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030603003739.GG14878@vitelus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0.6, required 7, AWL, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:37:39PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:37:02PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote: > > On Monday 02 June 2003 17:14, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > > > For the past few days, it seems like every time something changes in > > > BK, the bkcvs repository has all of its files touched. At least, all > > > files in the repository have a P preceding their names on a cvs up. > > > > > > It's not intolerable, but I was wondering if anyone's aware of it. > > > > CVS thinks of changes as having been applied in a certain order, with each > > cange applying to the result of previous changes. > > I understand that they are built on different models, but I had > thought the bk->cvs translator was somewhat intelligent. I had never > seen all the files in the CVS repository touched until a few days ago. It is intelligent but it is busted, believe me, I know. The conversion happens on my desktop and it thrashes the hell out of the disk when CVS tags. We're swamped working on a BK release, that's our first priority. As soon as I get a breather I'll get back to the bk2cvs convertoer. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm