From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263176AbTFDI1R (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 04:27:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263185AbTFDI1Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 04:27:16 -0400 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([81.30.235.3]:36497 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263176AbTFDI1Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2003 04:27:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:40:36 +0200 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-yoann@ifrance.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vojtech@suse.cz, acahalan@cs.uml.edu Subject: Re: another must-fix: major PS/2 mouse problem Message-ID: <20030604104036.A5583@ucw.cz> References: <1054431962.22103.744.camel@cube> <3EDD87FD.6020307@ifrance.com> <20030603232155.1488c02f.akpm@digeo.com> <20030604094737.C5345@ucw.cz> <20030604005302.41f3b0b8.akpm@digeo.com> <20030604100017.A5475@ucw.cz> <20030604011413.16787964.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030604011413.16787964.akpm@digeo.com>; from akpm@digeo.com on Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:14:13AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:14:13AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Has this problem been observed in 2.4 kernels? > > > > No, since 2.4 doesn't have the re-sync code in the mouse driver which is > > triggering in this case. But problems with the machine being flooded > > with interrupts from the NIC so hard that it actually cannot do anything > > are quite common. > > So is the resync code doing more good than harm? Hard to tell. The people for which it does good don't complain. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR