From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: wa@almesberger.net
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 08:28:02 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030606.082802.124082825.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030606122616.B3232@almesberger.net>
From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 12:26:16 -0300
David S. Miller wrote:
> But regardless I should be able to yank an ATM device out of the
> kernel (unregistering it) even if there are a thousand VCC's attached
> to it.
Why ? A VCC is more like a network interface than a TCP
connection.
It's more like an IP tunnel and a route, granted. And those are
similarly configured, and to me the same rules apply.
Removing an ATM device while there are open VCCs isn't a lot
more useful than removing a telephone while there is still a
call in progress :-)
It's like rmmod'ing TCP while you have TCP connections.
And it's like unregistering IP tunnels while you still have
routes going over them, the routes just get deleted.
And frankly I see absolutely NOTHING wrong with doing these
sorts of things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-06 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-05 15:28 [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2) chas williams
2003-06-06 9:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 10:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 11:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 13:57 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 14:07 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:13 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:26 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:28 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-06-06 15:54 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 16:40 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 21:54 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-06 23:19 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:44 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-07 0:44 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:59 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 11:10 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 23:37 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 21:43 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-06 22:56 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:52 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:20 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:51 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 1:12 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 6:58 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 19:01 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-08 6:57 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-08 22:32 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 5:35 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 22:59 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 23:14 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 23:34 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:39 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-10 18:27 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-08 3:45 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-08 6:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-10 21:34 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-10 22:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 23:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:06 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:45 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:56 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 6:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 18:18 ` Ryan Anderson
2003-06-07 11:19 ` James Stevenson
2003-06-07 11:19 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 15:36 ` James Stevenson
2003-06-07 16:03 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-07 6:53 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-08 3:31 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:55 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:10 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:56 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 1:11 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 3:48 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 13:37 ` Duncan Sands
2003-06-09 13:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 13:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 14:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 14:54 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 14:57 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 7:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-08 4:05 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 11:06 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 15:05 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 15:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 17:03 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 11:25 ` David Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030606.082802.124082825.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wa@almesberger.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).