linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Terje Fåberg" <terje_fb@yahoo.no>
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Real multi-user linux
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:01:11 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030613140111.34979.qmail@web12901.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200306130813.h5D8DeA8000540@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>

John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com> skrev:

> This idea has come up before, have a look at:
>  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?.....

Thank you for providing these references.  Especially
the first thread discusses some thoughts I had, too. 

To summarize: People have thought about of one linux
box directly supporting multiple (X-)consoles before.
But this is not possible as of now, because X would
have to be told to stop switching consoles and because
the kernel cannot activate more than one console at
one time. Additionately, multiple video cards may
require mappings into the same memory area for certain
functions. Some people have started to work on  a
solution, but these projects were orphaned. 

My motivation is simply a private one.  I have a
P3-866 with 1.5G RAM and a scsi raid here which serves
its own console and an old P133 as X terminal.
Although this machine is already some kind of
outdated, it has plenty of power to serve two users
with one KDE session each. 

I started to think about this, because the P133 died
away due to a failing processor fan. Although
replacing the whole machine with a similar one
probably is cheaper than a good usb keyboard and
mouse, it is also a question of comfort. No waiting
for the terminal to boot up, no double administration,
less power consumption, less space needed and so on. 

Although I have some C/C++ expirience, I have
absolutely no clues about kernel and or X internals,
so I guess I have to forget this for now. 

Regards, 
Terje


______________________________________________________
Få den nye Yahoo! Messenger på http://no.messenger.yahoo.com/
Nye ikoner og bakgrunner, webkamera med superkvalitet og dobbelt så morsom

  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-13 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-13  8:13 Real multi-user linux John Bradford
2003-06-13 14:01 ` Terje Fåberg [this message]
2003-06-13 15:19   ` Gerhard Mack
2003-06-13 16:33     ` Alan Cox
2003-06-13 16:56   ` James Simmons
2003-06-13 20:39     ` Bernd Eckenfels
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-16  8:12 Aivils.Stoss
2003-06-13 20:30 John Bradford
2003-06-13 21:54 ` James Simmons
2003-06-13 17:46 John Bradford
2003-06-13 17:43 John Bradford
2003-06-13 20:11 ` James Simmons
2003-06-13 17:34 John Bradford
2003-06-13 17:32 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-13 20:00   ` James Simmons
2003-06-12 23:19 Terje Fåberg
2003-06-13  0:43 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-06-13 17:00   ` James Simmons
2003-06-13 17:17     ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030613140111.34979.qmail@web12901.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=terje_fb@yahoo.no \
    --cc=john@grabjohn.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).