From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265543AbTFMVkI (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:40:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265542AbTFMVkH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:40:07 -0400 Received: from 015.atlasinternet.net ([212.9.93.15]:35292 "EHLO minime.uib.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265543AbTFMVga (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:36:30 -0400 From: Ricardo Galli To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.4.21 released (acpi) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:49:20 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306132349.22072.gallir@uib.es> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If you don't like it, just disable it. For lots of other people with new > laptops the latest ACPI is mandatory. ... >> For me acpid is not workin well. When I use acpid on ECS_L7VTA-00-C (BIOS-1.6) >> the network card (integrated with main borad) is not working, DHCPd client is >> time outing and there is no routing via that hardware ;-) Not for Dell Latitude (X200), no battery detected, no suspend, button doesn't shutdown nicely (it just switches the machine off). So, still surviving with APM, even in 2.5.70. And, yes, I already reported several times since 2.5.68 and 2.4.21-rc2-acX But I vote for XFS. -- ricardo