From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265631AbTFNK1P (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 06:27:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265664AbTFNK1P (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 06:27:15 -0400 Received: from pointblue.com.pl ([62.89.73.6]:21773 "EHLO pointblue.com.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265631AbTFNK1O convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 06:27:14 -0400 From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz Organization: K4 Labs To: mirsev@cicese.mx, Damian Kolkowski Subject: Re: via-rhine strange behavior 2.4.21-rc8 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:12:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200306121227.07122@gjs> <20030613170426.GB573@deimos.one.pl> <3EEA12C0.E15DBAF2@cicese.mx> In-Reply-To: <3EEA12C0.E15DBAF2@cicese.mx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306141112.25252@gjs> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 13 of June 2003 19:06, Serguei Miridonov wrote: > Are you sure that ACPI is the reason? Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote about > generic 2.4.21-rc8 = 2.4.21 which does not have the new ACPI code. Yep, it was vanilla 2.4.21-rc8 (which become 2.4.21 at the moment). - -- Grzegorz Jaskiewicz K4 Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+6vUIqu082fCQYIgRArd6AJ0TZgROPpzSkvJuyrRFtzhpIO9noQCfcz66 fXVrbcOGV1JKPVcNudcfY/s= =E8Lk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----