From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265614AbTFNL4I (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 07:56:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264375AbTFNL4H (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 07:56:07 -0400 Received: from cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.16.30]:49160 "EHLO cs.huji.ac.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265669AbTFNLz5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 07:55:57 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:09:38 +0300 From: Tom Alsberg To: "Andrey V. Savochkin" Cc: Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: PCI ID Patch for Intel Ether Express Pro 100 VE (82801BA) Message-ID: <20030614120938.GA1058@cs.huji.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Face: "5"j@Y1Peoz1;ftTv>\|['ox-csmV+:_RDNdi/2lSe2x?0:HVAeVW~ajwQ7RfDlcb^18eJ;t,O,s5-aNdU/DJ2E8h1s,..4}N9$27u`pWmH|;s!zlqqVwr9R^_ji=1\3}Z6gQBYyQ]{gd5-V8s^fYf{$V2*_&S>eA|SH@Y\hOVUjd[5eah{EO@gCr.ydSpJHJIU[QsH~bC?$C@O:SzF=CaUxp80-iknM(]q(W --- drivers/net/eepro100.c.orig Sat Jun 14 14:51:26 2003 +++ drivers/net/eepro100.c Sat Jun 14 14:51:08 2003 @@ -2392,6 +2392,7 @@ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x103C, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, }, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x103D, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, }, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x103E, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, }, + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1050, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, }, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1059, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, }, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1227, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, }, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1228, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, }, I am not sure how reliable it is, and whther other modifications should be made, but it worked fine for now. I tried the alternative e100 driver - didn't originally work as well, but I did not bother to try patching it too. Anyway, I would like it to be added to the driver, so that new machines with that adapter will work out of the box. Thanks, -- Tom -- Tom Alsberg - hacker (being the best description fitting this space) Web page: http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~alsbergt/ DISCLAIMER: The above message does not even necessarily represent what my fingers have typed on the keyboard, save anything further.