From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265676AbTFNNiH (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:38:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265674AbTFNNgl (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:36:41 -0400 Received: from mrw.demon.co.uk ([194.222.96.226]:5760 "EHLO rebecca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265672AbTFNNgZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:36:25 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Mark Watts To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Xeon processors &&Hyper-Threading Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:50:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <3EE9FDFA.6020803@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200306141450.11804.m.watts@mrw.demon.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > You recompile the kernel for SMP as well as P4. If the motherboard > hasn't disabled HT capabilities, you will take full advantage of > the processor under Linux. Whatever "full advantage" means, is > not absolute, but whatever it is, will be used to its fullest. > Basically, if the code is I/O bound, you'll not see any difference. > If the code is compute-intensive, you will. I discovered that you need the 'CPU Enumeration' part of ACPI to be enabled otherwise the kernel only sees physical processors, not sibling HT processors - shouldnt this be selected automatically when you select SMP ?