From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264955AbTFYSvU (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:51:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264952AbTFYSvT (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:51:19 -0400 Received: from dvmwest.gt.owl.de ([62.52.24.140]:8463 "EHLO dvmwest.gt.owl.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264924AbTFYSvG (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:51:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:05:15 +0200 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SOLVED - Testing IDE-TCQ and Taskfile - doesn't work nicely:) Message-ID: <20030625190515.GJ29233@lug-owl.de> Mail-Followup-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030625182210.GI29233@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux mail 2.4.18 X-gpg-fingerprint: 250D 3BCF 7127 0D8C A444 A961 1DBD 5E75 8399 E1BB X-gpg-key: wwwkeys.de.pgp.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-06-25 20:44:19 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote in message : > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-06-25 01:08:13 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > wrote in message : > > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 15:44:36 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > > wrote in message : > > However, allow me to ask why this occured never bevore (for other > > people)? Do they all have only one drive? Does nobody use TCQ? Nobody > > with old hardware (though, your patch hasn't touched the core PIIX > > parts...)? >=20 > nobody is stupid^H^Hbrave enough to use TCQ ;-) Well... I knew that it was, erm, brave to use it at some time (this box isn't really important - if I kill its filesystems, I'll simply re-install and recover my mirror scripts:) , but new, where 2.5.x starts to be really useable, I'd suggest to face users with upcoming problems: CONFIG_IDE_TASKFILE_IO It is safe to say Y to this question, in most cases. (By the way, exactly which cases are ment?) CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_TCQ If you have such a drive, say Y here. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_TCQ_DEFAULT Generally say Y here. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_TCQ_DEPTH You probably just want the default of 32 here. (Default queue depth is 8, not 32...) Right now, I'm building 2.5.73-bk3 + your 2nd patch. Let's face it:) MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B=FCrger" | im Internet! | im Ira= k! ret =3D do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(IRAQ_WAR_2 | DRM | TCPA)); --J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE++fJrHb1edYOZ4bsRAmYqAJ9iNxr664CtVYbkHGSzRwKEEtNR4ACfQvkC yQT4OrbMN9H4iGdSN82Ltws= =C6en -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY--