From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265346AbTFZCxp (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:53:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265352AbTFZCxp (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:53:45 -0400 Received: from h80ad2750.async.vt.edu ([128.173.39.80]:8320 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265346AbTFZCxo (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:53:44 -0400 Message-Id: <200306260307.h5Q37hCV003595@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chris.ricker@genetics.utah.edu Subject: Re: Hotplug/PPP oddness n 2.5.73-mm1 - scripts not running, bad event In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:58:35 PDT." <20030625145835.14206ec7.shemminger@osdl.org> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <200306252028.h5PKSSnd002877@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20030625145835.14206ec7.shemminger@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-940485865P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:07:43 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_-940485865P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:58:35 PDT, Stephen Hemminger said: > > This patch causes an external script API change. > > Because network device go through the standard path, the action passed to t he script > > is no longer register or unregister but is now "add" or "remove" like other devices. > > This is a good thing. When testing (at least on RHAT) just change /etc/hot plug/net.agent > > case statement: > > > > case $ACTION in > > add|register) Yeah, that was the fairly obvious fix... now who's job is it to fix it on the hotplug website, and when? Also, who gets to update the currently non-existent entry in Documentation/Changes (i've cc'ed Chris Ricker)? Or should this just get tacked on the "to do before 2.6.0 comes out" list for now? --==_Exmh_-940485865P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE++mN/cC3lWbTT17ARAvWXAJ914d3LFeXfotLSGMMTRblu9SNeLgCgz/eC JRO+g2l9LNK9MvVMsYIxskA= =2bc3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-940485865P--