From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: "Diego Calleja García" <diegocg@teleline.es>
Cc: dgp85@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PPP Modem connection impossible with 2.5.73-bk2
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:41:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030626164116.1bfbad1e.shemminger@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030626195238.673bcffd.diegocg@teleline.es>
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:52:38 +0200
Diego Calleja García <diegocg@teleline.es> wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2003 21:06:18 +0200
> Flameeyes <dgp85@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > After the upgrade from 2.5.73-bk1 to bk2 the pppd daemon is killed, so
> > the ppp connection is impossible.
> > After the reverse of the patch I can connect.
> > I also applied the bk2-bk3 patch (without the bk2), and I have no
> > problems.
> > So the problem is in bk2.
>
>
> I can confirm it.
> Jun 25 00:11:09 estel chat[13737]: -- got it
> Jun 25 00:11:09 estel chat[13737]: send (\d)
> Jun 25 00:11:10 estel pppd[13734]: Serial connection established.
> Jun 25 00:11:10 estel pppd[13734]: using channel 8
> Jun 25 00:11:10 estel pppd[13734]: Using interface ppp0
> Jun 25 00:11:10 estel pppd[13734]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magi
> c 0x54b41996> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1514> <asyncmap
> 0x0> <auth chap MD5> <magic 0xf1833c0e> <mrru 1514> <endpoint [null]>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <mrru 1514>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: rcvd [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <pcomp>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <magi
> c 0x54b41996> <accomp>]
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: Modem hangup
> Jun 25 00:11:11 estel pppd[13734]: Connection terminated.
> Jun 25 00:11:12 estel pppd[13734]: tcsetattr: Invalid argument
> Jun 25 00:11:12 estel pppd[13734]: Exit.
>
>
> Plain 2.5.73 works.
What is your ppp configuration, anything special?
Is serial line fat or slow? Is this on SMP or UP system?
I can't reproduce this over a null modem cable so trying to see what could
be different.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-26 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-25 19:06 PPP Modem connection impossible with 2.5.73-bk2 Flameeyes
2003-06-26 17:52 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-06-26 23:41 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2003-06-27 0:28 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-06-27 20:20 ` Matthew Harrell
2003-06-27 20:57 ` Flameeyes
2003-06-27 21:51 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-06-27 22:06 ` Flameeyes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030626164116.1bfbad1e.shemminger@osdl.org \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=dgp85@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=diegocg@teleline.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).