From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264810AbTF0V3p (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:29:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264806AbTF0V3p (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:29:45 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:55736 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264802AbTF0V3n (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:29:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20030627.143738.41641928.davem@redhat.com> To: davidel@xmailserver.org Cc: mbligh@aracnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <20030626.224739.88478624.davem@redhat.com> <21740000.1056724453@[10.10.2.4]> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Davide Libenzi Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT) The good of a bug tracking system against the mailing list is that bugs do survive in a bug tracking system, No, this is the _BAD_ part, shit accumulates equally with useful reports. Useful reports in non-bugtracking system environments get retransmitted and eventually looked at.