From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265637AbTF2LmM (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2003 07:42:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265638AbTF2LmM (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2003 07:42:12 -0400 Received: from [195.208.223.239] ([195.208.223.239]:2688 "EHLO pls.park.msu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265637AbTF2LmM (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2003 07:42:12 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 15:56:16 +0400 From: Ivan Kokshaysky To: Oleg Drokin Cc: "T. Weyergraf" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.73 on alpha/smp build failure Message-ID: <20030629155616.B694@pls.park.msu.ru> References: <20030628133818.GA6073@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030628133818.GA6073@namesys.com>; from green@namesys.com on Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 05:38:18PM +0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 05:38:18PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > When I compile the kernel the alpha itself (tried shipped suse 8.1 gcc 3.2.2 > and self-compiled gcc 2.95.3), it jumps to the address zero quickly after > launching init and panics. Most likely it's binutils problem. Versions 2.13.90.0.18 and newer should be OK, as discussed recently on l-k. Ivan.