From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265826AbTF3KjQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:39:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265828AbTF3KjQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:39:16 -0400 Received: from jurassic.park.msu.ru ([195.208.223.243]:34056 "EHLO jurassic.park.msu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265826AbTF3KjP (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:39:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:52:43 +0400 From: Ivan Kokshaysky To: Oleg Drokin Cc: "T. Weyergraf" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.73 on alpha/smp build failure Message-ID: <20030630145243.A22506@jurassic.park.msu.ru> References: <20030628133818.GA6073@namesys.com> <20030629155616.B694@pls.park.msu.ru> <20030630054259.GC17466@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030630054259.GC17466@namesys.com>; from green@namesys.com on Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:42:59AM +0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:42:59AM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > I have : > $ alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu-size -V > GNU size 2.14 20030612 Well, I guess it's cross binutils? What about native binutils installed on alpha? The package shipped with suse 8.1 (binutils-2.12.90.0.15-27) doesn't work for 2.5 kernels. > See attached assembly generated by cross compiler vs native compiler. Code generated by gcc-2.95 is obviously bogus. Which is not surprising - 2.95 is known to be broken for 32-bit host -> 64-bit target cross-compilation. Try something more recent. ;-) Ivan.