From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265795AbTGJJJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 05:09:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265874AbTGJJJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 05:09:13 -0400 Received: from rumms.uni-mannheim.de ([134.155.50.52]:19162 "EHLO rumms.uni-mannheim.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265795AbTGJJJL (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 05:09:11 -0400 From: Thomas Schlichter To: Piet Delaney , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.5.74-mm3 - apm_save_cpus() Macro still bombs out Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:22:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20030708223548.791247f5.akpm@osdl.org> <20030709021849.31eb3aec.akpm@osdl.org> <1057815890.22772.19.camel@www.piet.net> In-Reply-To: <1057815890.22772.19.camel@www.piet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200307101122.59138.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 10 July 2003 07:44, Piet Delaney wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 02:18, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Thomas Schlichter wrote: > > . > . > . > > > Seems complex. I just have this: ~~snip~~ > I'll settle for Matt Mackall fix for now: > > +#define apm_save_cpus() (current->cpus_allowed) > > I wonder why other, like Thomas Schlichter , > had no problem with the CPU_MASK_NONE fix. Well, I didn't try the CPU_MASK_NONE fix. I am using my fix attached to my first mail, but Andrew ment it was too complex (your quoting from above). So he proposed the simpler fix, wich simply looked good to me... > I tried adding the #include that Marc-Christian > Petersen sugested but it didn't help. Looks > like Jan De Luyck had a similar result. > > -piet Thomas