From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264909AbTGKSV0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:21:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264929AbTGKSVH (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:21:07 -0400 Received: from ip67-95-245-82.z245-95-67.customer.algx.net ([67.95.245.82]:12552 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264909AbTGKSAK (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:00:10 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:14:53 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.5 'what to expect' Message-ID: <20030711181453.GA976@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel References: <20030711140219.GB16433@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030711140219.GB16433@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:02:19PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > Enormous block size support. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How about "block device size" instead? This made me think of blocks larger than page size initially (even though I know that hasn't happened). > o ide_scsi is completely broken in 2.5.x. Known problem. If you need it > either use 2.4 or fix it 8) Is this still true? I seem to recall testing a kernel in the 2.5.6x range, and it worked. (haven't tested more recent kernels yet -- compiling one now though) > EXT3. > ~~~~~ > - data=journal mode is currently broken. Is this still true (or is that still in -mm?)