From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265261AbTGKTqJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:46:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265144AbTGKToD (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:44:03 -0400 Received: from ip67-95-245-82.z245-95-67.customer.algx.net ([67.95.245.82]:21515 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265141AbTGKTmy (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:42:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:57:37 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: linux-kernel , xose@wanadoo.es Subject: Re: is lvm stuck in 2.4 ? Message-ID: <20030711195737.GC976@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel , xose@wanadoo.es References: <3F0F0746.8060403@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F0F0746.8060403@wanadoo.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:51:50PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > kernel has version 1.0.5+ (22/07/2002), but latest > is 1.0.7(2003/03/03). Is there any problem with 1.0.7 and > 2.4 ? Most likely not. It probably hasn't been merged yet. As well as the vfs patch needed for the journaled filesystems (forgot the name). Are there any efforts to get this merged?